Skip to content
Owen Allen

#2Owen Allen

Owen Allen is a Explosive Back for Air Force. Owen's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 132 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Owen Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
749 Rush yards5 Rush TD131 Carries5.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume50
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving7
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Bucknell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Bucknell: +0.86 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Utah State: +0.01 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Boise State: -0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Hawai'i: -0.47 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs UNLV: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wyoming: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Army: -0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San José State: +0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UConn: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs New Mexico: -0.16 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado State: +0.15 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDEPA/play
1vsBucknellW49-13133.000.86
3@Utah StateL30-49-3.116533.310.01
4vsBoise StateL37-493.1471.80-0.38
5vsHawai'iL35-441.73113.70-0.47
7@UNLVL48-514.31719211.320.68
8vsWyomingW24-21-11.31010510.500.49
10vsArmyL17-200.88324.00-0.19
11@San José StateW26-16-14.3201095.500.10
12@UConnL16-265.1221225.500.16
13vsNew MexicoL3-200.9581.60-0.16
14@Colorado StateW42-21-15.6251074.320.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.4%
Passing plays
0.7%
Rushing plays
21.9%
Standard downs
21.6%
Passing downs
3.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
-1.30 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.