Skip to content
Kevin Jennings

#7Kevin Jennings

QB·SMU·202520247.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Kevin Jennings is a 2-year Clutch Passer for SMU. Kevin's 2025 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 517 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kevin Jennings's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
300/454 Comp/Att3641 Pass yards26 Pass TD13 INT66.1% Comp %
Rushing
54 Rush yards4 Rush TD70 Carries0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat43
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch88
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Boston College (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs East Texas A&M: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Baylor: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri State: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs TCU: +0.43 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Syracuse: +0.60 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.41 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Clemson: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wake Forest: -0.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Miami: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boston College: +0.61 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Louisville: +0.56 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs California: +0.33 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsEast Texas A&MW42-1322/302602126.11210.40
2vsBaylorL45-481.416/222953150.11600.14
3@Missouri StateW28-10-10.724/362811162.7-1100.33
4@TCUL24-358.324/382903276.81300.43
6vsSyracuseW31-18-13.129/352854186.0-600.60
7vsStanfordW34-10-11.822/302472076.6-1900.41
8@ClemsonW35-249.523/432902169.12000.21
9@Wake ForestL12-135.721/391710140.770-0.18
10vsMiamiW26-2020.729/443651067.6-810.23
11@Boston CollegeW45-13-8.516/323263149.8100.61
13vsLouisvilleW38-612.429/373033093.9210.56
14@CaliforniaL35-38-3.224/362502175.42310.33
20vsArizonaW24-1912.021/322780340

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.4%
Passing plays
98.3%
Rushing plays
14.5%
Standard downs
51.9%
Passing downs
79.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.060−0.302025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024SMU
8.4
244.6
2025SMU
7.2
187.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Kevin Jennings Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Smu · Gridpex