Skip to content
Jayden Scott

#1Jayden Scott

Jayden Scott is a Committee Back for NC State. Jayden's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 99 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Scott's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
595 Rush yards4 Rush TD106 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions132 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.8 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns234 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume41
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency3
  • Receiving47
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency3th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.16 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.57 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Campbell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs East Carolina: -0.58 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia: -0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wake Forest: -0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Duke: -0.07 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Campbell: +0.57 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Notre Dame: +0.07 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: +0.41 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia Tech: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Miami: -0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida State: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs North Carolina: +0.27 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEast CarolinaW24-178.04133.30-0.58
2vsVirginiaW35-3111.18303.80-0.08
3@Wake ForestW34-245.77233.302170-0.10
4@DukeL33-456.67355.00150-0.07
5vsVirginia TechL21-23-10.1362.011900.38
6vsCampbellW56-1010898.9211300.57
7@Notre DameL7-3624.45153.0032600.07
9@PittsburghL34-538.43248.001300.41
10vsGeorgia TechW48-369.3241968.2121100.21
12@MiamiL7-4120.77142.003400-0.13
13vsFlorida StateW21-117.24153.800.14
14vsNorth CarolinaW42-19-6.65275.401800.27
20vsMemphisW31-77.6191085.70

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.4%
Passing plays
3.7%
Rushing plays
26.3%
Standard downs
16.4%
Passing downs
10.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.