Skip to content
Jayden Clerveaux
Jayden Clerveaux

#31Jayden Clerveaux

Jayden Clerveaux is a Committee Back for Central Michigan.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Clerveaux's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
43 Rush yards0 Rush TD7 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions1 Rec yards0 Rec TD1.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume20
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving64
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs New Mexico (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 1 vs New Mexico: +0.66 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Colgate: +0.05 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@New MexicoL7-384.42189.001100.66
2vsColgateW13-105255.000.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.1%
Passing plays
2.5%
Rushing plays
10.1%
Standard downs
8.6%
Passing downs
4.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.20
Passing downs
1.92
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.59 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.