Skip to content
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele

#3Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele

Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele is a Clutch Passer for California. Jaron-Keawe's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 562 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
315/491 Comp/Att3446 Pass yards18 Pass TD9 INT64.2% Comp %
Rushing
-120 Rush yards4 Rush TD60 Carries-2.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

73
Attempts
8.1y
Avg depth
3.6y
After catch
62%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.1 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 3.6 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
4
50% · 75y
3
67% · 81y
3
67% · 53y
short
34
65% · 145y
8
63% · 36y
21
57% · 63y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat18
  • Consistency64
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs SMU (SP+ 13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 1 vs Oregon State: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Southern: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Minnesota: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs San Diego State: -0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Boston College: +0.30 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Duke: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs North Carolina: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Virginia: -0.12 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisville: +0.20 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Stanford: +0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs SMU: +0.66 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Oregon StateW34-15-15.920/302343068.93000.35
2vsTexas SouthernW35-326/372590118.4710.07
3vsMinnesotaW27-141.524/382793075.0-1500.27
4@San Diego StateL0-346.717/382080217.4-20-0.27
5@Boston CollegeW28-24-8.522/342542156.0100.30
6vsDukeL21-456.620/312451329.8-4000.20
8vsNorth CarolinaW21-18-6.621/392091045.5-810.24
9@Virginia TechL34-42-10.124/392861056.3-2700.30
10vsVirginiaL21-3111.119/302130219.0-420-0.12
11@LouisvilleW29-2612.430/473232084.4-1500.20
13@StanfordL10-31-11.833/492690057.2-2410.07
14vsSMUW38-3513.431/403304092.90.66
20@Hawai'iL31-351.728/393371079.0151

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.3%
Passing plays
97.4%
Rushing plays
9.0%
Standard downs
51.4%
Passing downs
82.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.03
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
0.22 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.