Skip to content
Jaden Williams
Jaden Williams

#0Jaden Williams

WR·Boston College·2023

Jaden Williams is a Versatile WR for Boston College.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaden Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
12 Receptions210 Rec yards1 Rec TD17.5 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns31 KR yards0 KR TD6 Punt returns45 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume7
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency68
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.36 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 4.24 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Army (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.240−4.24Wk 1 vs Northern Illinois: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Holy Cross: +2.41 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Louisville: +0.62 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Army: +4.24 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +0.99 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UConn: +1.44 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Syracuse: -0.37 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNorthern IllinoisL24-27-7.523517.51300.10
2vsHoly CrossW31-28—27035.00472.41
4@LouisvilleL28-568.0188.0080.62
6@ArmyW27-24-4.015757.00574.24
8@Georgia TechW38-230.311010.00100.99
9vsUConnW21-14-15.622010.00111.44
10@SyracuseW17-10-4.43103.306-0.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.3%
Passing plays
5.3%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
2.2%
Passing downs
2.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
2.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.85 / 2.77

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.