Skip to content
Hayden Reed

#8Hayden Reed

RB·Army·2025

Hayden Reed is a Committee Back for Army. Hayden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 68 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hayden Reed's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
335 Rush yards3 Rush TD74 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions2 Rec yards0 Rec TD1.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume37
  • Explosiveness30
  • Consistency40
  • Receiving19
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency40th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.13 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.36 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs UAB (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5600.56Wk 1 vs Tarleton State: -0.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: -0.21 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs North Texas: +0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs East Carolina: -0.56 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: +0.36 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Charlotte: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Air Force: -0.28 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: -0.35 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTarleton StateL27-3019884.61-0.12
2@Kansas StateW24-217.05102.00-0.21
4vsNorth TexasL38-4513.8191135.912200.09
5@East CarolinaL6-288.0341.30-0.56
6@UABW31-13-15.812544.510.36
7vsCharlotteW24-7-26.711534.800.01
10@Air ForceW20-17-3.2252.50-0.28
11vsTempleW14-13-5.1382.70-0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.1%
Passing plays
1.4%
Rushing plays
15.1%
Standard downs
16.3%
Passing downs
4.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.00
Passing downs
-0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.72 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.