Skip to content
Hank Brown

#9Hank Brown

Hank Brown is a Dual-Threat QB for Auburn. Hank's 2024 season produced 10.2 total EPA across 41 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hank Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
27/43 Comp/Att403 Pass yards6 Pass TD3 INT62.8% Comp %
Rushing
10 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume76
  • Dual-Threat74
  • Consistency57
  • Clutch58
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Alabama A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Alabama A&M: +0.79 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs New Mexico: +0.60 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: -0.35 EPA/play4
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAlabama A&MW73-33/5962098.90.79
3vsNew MexicoW45-19-14.817/252354076.5-200.60
4vsArkansasL14-2411.07/1372039.5120-0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.5%
Passing plays
47.2%
Rushing plays
3.7%
Standard downs
24.4%
Passing downs
32.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.