Skip to content
Doug Brumfield

#2Doug Brumfield

QB·UNLV·2023

Doug Brumfield is a Clutch Passer for UNLV. Doug's 2023 season produced -1.7 total EPA across 47 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Doug Brumfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
26/50 Comp/Att252 Pass yards0 Pass TD2 INT52.0% Comp %
Rushing
34 Rush yards1 Rush TD24 Carries1.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume48
  • Dual-Threat14
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch58
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.73 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.75 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Air Force (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.3002.30Wk 1 vs Bryant: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan: -0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Vanderbilt: +0.03 EPA/play3Wk 12 vs Air Force: +0.75 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San José State: -2.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: -0.18 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBryantW44-1411/18860142.44910.57
2@MichiganL7-3531.310/191000021.9-110-0.14
3vsVanderbiltW40-37-12.72/415010.5-1000.03
12@Air ForceW31-275.91300.75
13vsSan José StateL31-37-3.410-2.30
14vsBoise StateL20-445.93/9510011.8-80-0.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.9%
Passing plays
26.7%
Rushing plays
6.6%
Standard downs
12.9%
Passing downs
24.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.08
Passing downs
0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.04 / -0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.