Skip to content
DJ England-Chisolm
DJ England-Chisolm

#3DJ England-Chisolm

WR·Middle Tennessee·2023

DJ England-Chisolm is a Versatile WR for Middle Tennessee. DJ's 2023 season produced 30.2 total EPA across 30 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So DJ England-Chisolm's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
28 Receptions347 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.4 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns185 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume12
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency70
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.29 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 3.37 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Florida International (SP+ -21).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.370−3.37Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: -0.59 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Murray State: +2.02 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: +0.33 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Jacksonville State: +0.78 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.44 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Liberty: +0.80 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs New Mexico State: +2.25 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida International: +3.37 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTEP: +1.88 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Sam Houston: +0.74 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@AlabamaL7-5623.13165.3080.05
2@MissouriL19-2319.3111.001-0.59
3vsMurray StateW35-14—35518.30302.02
5@Western KentuckyL10-31-2.03206.7080.33
6vsJacksonville StateL30-45-1.62115.5090.78
7vsLouisiana TechW31-23-12.92147.0080.44
8@LibertyL35-428.034113.71360.80
10@New Mexico StateL7-13-1.812727.01272.25
11vsFlorida InternationalW40-6-21.227638.01723.37
12vsUTEPW34-30-16.233812.70181.88
13@Sam HoustonL20-23-13.85489.60130.74

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.1%
Passing plays
7.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.9%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.67
Passing downs
1.58
Pass / Rush EPA
1.00 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.