Skip to content
Devin Kargman

#15Devin Kargman

Devin Kargman is a Clutch Passer for Kent State.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Devin Kargman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
8/17 Comp/Att74 Pass yards0 Pass TD1 INT47.1% Comp %
Rushing
-20 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries-6.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume99
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
6@OklahomaL0-4418.38/16740115.3-200-0.18
8@ToledoL10-456.00/10000.1

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.6%
Passing plays
78.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
33.3%
Passing downs
36.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.49
Passing downs
0.29
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.13 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.