Skip to content
DeAree Rogers

#1DeAree Rogers

DeAree Rogers is a Slot Specialist WR for Northern Illinois. DeAree's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 57 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So DeAree Rogers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
46 Receptions506 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec
Returns
9 Punt returns70 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness27
  • Consistency75
  • Pass-Down7
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.92 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9201.92Wk 1 vs Holy Cross: +1.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Maryland: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Mississippi State: +0.82 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs San Diego State: +0.71 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Miami (OH): +1.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ohio: +0.44 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ball State: +1.92 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Toledo: -0.08 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Massachusetts: +0.81 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Michigan: -0.00 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kent State: +1.19 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsHoly CrossW19-1777310.40251.18
2@MarylandL9-200.63165.30110.33
4@Mississippi StateL10-384.168414.01240.82
5vsSan Diego StateL3-66.755110.20150.71
6vsMiami (OH)L14-25-3.444010.00201.14
7@Eastern MichiganL10-16-14.73258.3017-0.03
8@OhioL21-48-4.0710715.31500.44
9vsBall StateW21-7-23.034314.31221.92
11@ToledoL3-426.03299.7014-0.08
12@MassachusettsW45-3-36.6155.0050.81
13vsWestern MichiganL19-35-1.422110.5016-0.00
14vsKent StateL31-35-19.32126.0071.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.7%
Passing plays
23.8%
Rushing plays
0.8%
Standard downs
5.3%
Passing downs
15.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.88
Passing downs
0.62
Pass / Rush EPA
0.70 / 0.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.