NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
FO% against Win rate32 clubs
Montréal Canadiens have the best combined rank: 8th in ability to win (.526) and 2nd in faceoff % (57.9%). 8 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two barely move together (r = 0.14).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | Win rate | FO% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | .526#8 | 57.9%#2 | |
| 2 | .539#2 | 52.8%#11 | |
| 3 | .525#9 | 54.9%#6 | |
| 4 | .513#12 | 55.1%#5 | |
| 5 | .527#6 | 51.7%#13 | |
| 6 | .534#3 | 49.6%#17 | |
| 7 | .512#13 | 53.7%#7 | |
| 8 | .527#7 | 51.4%#14 | |
| 9 | .496#18 | 55.9%#4 | |
| 10 | .534#4 | 48.4%#20 | |
| 11 | .478#24 | 58.2%#1 | |
| 12 | .572#1 | 46.8%#25 | |
| 13 | .501#16 | 52.9%#10 | |
| 14 | .533#5 | 48.2%#22 | |
| 15 | .472#27 | 56.7%#3 | |
| 16 | .492#19 | 51.8%#12 | |
| 17 | .487#23 | 53.0%#9 | |
| 18 | .473#26 | 53.6%#8 | |
| 19 | .491#20 | 50.4%#16 | |
| 20 | .515#11 | 46.4%#26 | |
| 21 | .515#10 | 44.6%#28 | |
| 22 | .509#14 | 45.5%#27 | |
| 23 | .489#22 | 48.5%#19 | |
| 24 | .490#21 | 48.3%#21 | |
| 25 | .447#30 | 50.8%#15 | |
| 26 | .502#15 | 41.1%#31 | |
| 27 | .498#17 | 43.9%#30 | |
| 28 | .474#25 | 46.9%#24 | |
| 29 | .434#31 | 49.3%#18 | |
| 30 | .468#29 | 47.0%#23 | |
| 31 | .469#28 | 44.4%#29 | |
| 32 | .430#32 | 39.9%#32 |
What the two axes are
Ability to win. Recent win rate with newer games weighted more and every overtime or shootout game counted as a tie.
Faceoff %. Share of faceoffs won, all zones and situations.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
