Skip to content

NHL Team Explorer

NHL

Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.

2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27

ChartYour own pair

SH% against xGA − GA32 clubs

Seattle Kraken have the best combined rank: 2nd in goaltending above chances per game (+1.38) and 6th in shooting % (16.5%). 7 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two barely move together (r = -0.08).

Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks

#TeamxGA − GASH%
1Kraken+1.38#216.5%#6
2Ducks+0.80#817.5%#4
3Senators+1.18#513.2%#9
4Islanders+2.09#111.9%#16
5Capitals+1.20#412.5%#13
6Rangers+1.28#312.0%#15
7Mammoth+1.04#712.9%#11
8Avalanche−0.20#2121.5%#1
9Wild+1.07#611.7%#17
10Canucks−1.26#2620.9%#2
11Blue Jackets−0.79#2416.7%#5
12Jets+0.67#109.5%#20
13Penguins−0.44#2215.2%#8
14Sharks−0.12#2012.9%#12
15Canadiens−1.38#2716.3%#7
16Oilers−2.43#3118.1%#3
17Maple Leafs+0.78#97.2%#26
18Stars+0.59#117.4%#25
19Blues+0.06#1710.0%#19
20Panthers+0.40#137.8%#24
21Lightning+0.36#148.9%#23
22Bruins+0.10#169.1%#21
23Predators+0.47#126.5%#27
24Sabres−1.91#2913.0%#10
25Golden Knights−0.67#2311.6%#18
26Flyers−0.02#186.5%#28
27Kings−4.07#3212.1%#14
28Red Wings+0.33#153.4%#32
29Blackhawks−0.92#258.9%#22
30Hurricanes−0.11#195.7%#29
31Devils−1.46#283.7%#30
32Flames−1.98#303.7%#31
What the two axes are

Goaltending above chances per game. Expected goals against minus goals allowed, per game this season, empty net left out: what the goalies have saved beyond an average goalie on the same shots. Unlike the rating beside it, this is what happened, not pulled toward average.

Shooting %. Goals per shot on goal. Over one season much of the gap between clubs is luck, not finishing skill.

A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →