Skip to content

Central Michigan vs. Buffalo Prediction, Odds & Pick

Prediction, odds and the model's read

UB StadiumConference game

Our model's read

Model win probability
BUF 52%
Model line
BUF −0.5
Gridpex modelCMU 48% · BUF 52%
Pick BuffaloModel line BUF −0.5

Scouting report

2026 · 2 games in, blended with the projection

Neither side projects a clear way in. Central Michigan and Buffalo rate within touching distance on every unit matchup here, closest at staying out of the backfield — on this evidence it comes down to the things a season profile cannot see.

The two teams

Central Michigan

Central Michigan is in year 2 under Matt Drinkall. The strengths are defensive, led by 13th at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 114th at throwing it, and they are 111th at surviving second and twelve.

Central Michigan has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 20% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    0.97
    #13 of 138

Soft spots

  • Offensethrowing it
    -0.30
    #114 of 138
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    17%
    #111 of 138
  • Offensemoving the ball on the ground
    37%
    #110 of 138

Buffalo

balanced

Buffalo is in year 3 under Pete Lembo, whose offenses have been balanced. The way in is 137th at running it, and they are 132nd on first and second down.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+0.1%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −29.1% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Buffalo has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 27% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Soft spots

  • Offenserunning it
    -0.11
    #137 of 138
  • Offensefirst and second down
    39%
    #132 of 138
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    23%
    #132 of 138

Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.

Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

Pregame line
Pregame total
Model line
BUF −0.5
Projected total

Model prediction

how the number is built
Power rating (Elo)
BUF 1341
CMU 1259
Projected spread
BUF -0.5
incl. home edge
Model pick
BUF
52% to win
Market spread
sportsbook line
Model vs market
Agrees
aligned w/ market
Win prob: model / mkt
52%
BUF (no market)

Our model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (BUF Elo 1341, CMU Elo 1259 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects BUF -0.5 (52% to win), essentially in line with the market.

Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).

Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation

Where the game is won

2026 national rank · right is better

offensethe defense it faces

  • Moving the ball

    CMU136th91stBUF
    BUF130th42ndCMU
  • Through the air

    CMU137th132ndBUF
    BUF81st26thCMU
  • On the ground

    CMU78th66thBUF
    BUF119th101stCMU
  • Staying on the field

    CMU126th75thBUF
    BUF91st111thCMU
  • Taking care of it

    CMU124th76thBUF
    BUF104th22ndCMU

Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.

Season form — 2026

nationally ranked
CMU2026 season · national rank shownBUF
212.5137th
Total yards / game
324.0116th
3.8136th
Yards / play
4.4130th
53.0137th
Passing yards / game
219.081st
159.578th
Rushing yards / game
105.0119th
29.6%126th
3rd down %
36.8%91st
291.549th
Yards allowed / game
408.0112th
44.4%111th
3rd down % allowed
36.1%75th
-190th
Turnover margin
-2108th
7.590th
Penalties / game
7.590th

The matchup, in context

series history + adjusted profiles
The series13 meetings since 1999

Central Michigan leads 94 · 38% have been one-possession games

Opponent-adjusted profile2026
CMU BUF
-11.6 (#110)CORE overall-17.9 (#130)
-10 / +1offense / defense-12 / +6
0.78points / drive1.54
4.11allowed / drive2.62
56%three-and-outs46%

Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.

Pro

Key matchups

The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.

Create a free account →

You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.

FAQ

Who will win Central Michigan vs. Buffalo?

Gridpex's model favors Buffalo with a 52% win probability.

What's the predicted spread for Central Michigan vs. Buffalo?

The model projects Buffalo by 0.5.

What time is Central Michigan vs. Buffalo and what channel is it on?

Time TBD, at UB Stadium.

Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →

Model estimates for informational and entertainment purposes only. Not betting advice. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER. Data: CollegeFootballData.