Princeton vs. San Diego: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Princeton
▸
San Diego0-2
Final
Torero Stadium
PRINTeam statsSAN
399Total yards194
240Pass209
159Rush-15
19First downs9
5-163rd down4-16
2Turnovers0
32:27Possession27:33
- Q4 3:08PRINBakari Edwards Safety23–12
- Q3 5:44SAN Aidan Lehman 48 Yd Field Goal 21–12
- Q3 12:12PRINJohn Volker 2 Yd Run (Jeffrey Sexton Kick)21–9
- Q2 0:03SAN Aidan Lehman 55 Yd Field Goal 14–9
- Q2 4:54PRINLuke Colella 32 Yd pass from Blake Stenstrom (Jeffrey Sexton Kick)14–6
- Q1 4:03SAN Isaiah Williams 1 Yd Run (Aidan Lehman PAT blocked)7–6
- Q1 11:57PRINTamatoa Falatea 20 Yd pass from Blake Stenstrom (Jeffrey Sexton Kick)7–0
Kickoff161 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
SAN (top)PRIN (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: SAN 0%
Princeton
- PassBlake Stenstrom 23/38, 240 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
- RushJohn Volker 15 CAR, 82 YDS, 1 TD
- RecLuke Colella 3 REC, 62 YDS, 1 TD
San Diego
- PassDom Nankil 20/37, 209 YDS
- RushIsaiah Williams 11 CAR, 9 YDS, 1 TD
- RecJa'seem Reed 11 REC, 105 YDS
27.1sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
133
Points / snap
0.26
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsPRIN up 9 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,695 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
86%
PRIN went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Princeton vs. San Diego?
Princeton 23, San Diego 12.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked SAN , which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
PRIN
SAN
41%
Success rate
21%
0.18
EPA / pass
0.00
-0.06
EPA / rush
-0.22
46%
Early-down success
20%
39%
Pass success
27%
44%
Rush success
6%
12%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
9%
27%
Stuffed rush rate
41%
55%
Pass rate
71%
7.1
Avg 3rd-down distance
8.3
PRIN
7.1 yards to go on 3rd down
75 scrimmage snaps
SAN
8.3 yards to go on 3rd down
58 scrimmage snaps
| PRIN | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 399 | Total yards | 194 |
| 240 | Passing yards | 209 |
| 159 | Rushing yards | -15 |
| 19 | First downs | 9 |
| 5-16 | 3rd down | 4-16 |
| 0-2 | 4th down | 0-1 |
| 23/38 | Comp/Att | 20/37 |
| 6.3 | Yards per pass | 5.6 |
| 4.3 | Yards per rush | -0.7 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 8-75 | Penalties | 5-35 |
| 32:27 | Possession | 27:33 |
PRIN
6/9 with the model
−0.6 pts · −0.0% win prob
SAN
8/11 with the model
−0.5 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q1 0:00 PRIN punt on 4th & 10 at SAN 40. The model preferred field goal, a gap of 0.44 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishPRIN 3/15 scoring drives← own end zone →SAN 4/15 scoring drives
PRINTD8 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q1
SAN PUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 25Q1
PRINPUNT5 pl, 2 yds· own 36Q1
SAN TD7 pl, 50 yds· midfieldQ1
PRINPUNT8 pl, 33 yds· own 27Q1
SAN PUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 6Q2
PRINDOWNS10 pl, 53 yds· own 38Q2
SAN PUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 9Q2
PRINTD5 pl, 53 yds· own 47Q2
SAN PUNT3 pl, -2 yds· own 32Q2
PRINDOWNS8 pl, 16 yds· own 35Q2
SAN FG6 pl, 24 yds· own 49Q2
PRINEND1 pl, -3 yds· own 25Q2
SAN PUNT3 pl, 6 yds· own 25Q3
PRINTD3 pl, 58 yds· own 42Q3
SAN PUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 25Q3
PRINPUNT3 pl, 6 yds· own 25Q3
SAN FG7 pl, 45 yds· own 25Q3
PRINPUNT4 pl, 28 yds· own 28Q3
SAN PUNT6 pl, 14 yds· own 20Q3
PRINPUNT5 pl, 17 yds· own 22Q3
SAN PUNT5 pl, 6 yds· own 10Q4
SAN PUNT2 pl, 0 yds· opp 45Q4
PRINPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 19Q4
SAN MISS4 pl, 19 yds· opp 49Q4
PRINPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 30Q4
SAN DOWNS5 pl, 24 yds· own 22Q4
PRINPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· opp 46Q4
SAN SAF1 pl, -2 yds· own 2Q4
PRINEND6 pl, 12 yds· own 26Q4
- Q4 3:08PRINBakari Edwards Safety23–12
- Q3 5:44SAN Aidan Lehman 48 Yd Field Goal 21–12
- Q3 12:12PRINJohn Volker 2 Yd Run (Jeffrey Sexton Kick)21–9
- Q2 0:03SAN Aidan Lehman 55 Yd Field Goal 14–9
- Q2 4:54PRINLuke Colella 32 Yd pass from Blake Stenstrom (Jeffrey Sexton Kick)14–6
- Q1 4:03SAN Isaiah Williams 1 Yd Run (Aidan Lehman PAT blocked)7–6
- Q1 11:57PRINTamatoa Falatea 20 Yd pass from Blake Stenstrom (Jeffrey Sexton Kick)7–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
