Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2016?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

Points per drive · 2016

FBS medianACCBig 12FBS IndependentsSECMountain WestPac-12American Athlet…Big TenMid-AmericanConference USASun Belt

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
ACC142.41.1Pittsburgh 3.0
Big 12102.40.591Oklahoma 3.5
FBS Independents42.30.234Army 2.5
SEC142.20.524Alabama 2.8
Mountain West122.20.683New Mexico 3.0
Pac-12122.20.708Washington 3.2
American Athletic122.11.1Navy 3.6
Big Ten142.00.620Michigan 3.1
Mid-American121.90.673Western Michigan 3.6
Conference USA131.91.1Louisiana Tech 3.6
Sun Belt111.80.632App State 2.5

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.