Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2017?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

Team talent composite · 2017

FBS medianSECPac-12ACCBig TenBig 12American Athlet…FBS IndependentsMid-AmericanMountain WestConference USASun Belt

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
SEC14794.8166.4Alabama 997.6
Pac-1212668.7207.3USC 934.0
ACC14634.3123.2Florida State 925.0
Big Ten14633.6148.3Ohio State 959.1
Big 1210623.4113.5Texas 811.0
American Athletic12481.9131.4UCF 571.5
FBS Independents4470.8470.1Notre Dame 837.7
Mid-American12349.569.0Western Michigan 414.4
Mountain West12342.988.9Boise State 501.5
Conference USA14333.2102.6Florida Atlantic 470.9
Sun Belt12332.690.9Arkansas State 436.1

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.