Louisiana Tech vs. UL Monroe Prediction, Odds & Pick
Prediction, odds and the model's read
Our model's read
Scouting report
2026 projection · last season, roster and staff
Where Louisiana Tech gets at UL Monroe: 58th at keeping a clean pocket, against a unit 113th at generating havoc. Where UL Monroe gets at Louisiana Tech: 8th at hitting chunk plays, against a unit 115th at keeping everything in front of them. Louisiana Tech is also 49th at staying out of the backfield, against a unit 103rd.
How
LTattacks
ULM
- 1
Expect a clean pocket
sacks and tackles for loss · projected
LT#58 of 138ULM#113 of 138 - 2
Expect clean run lanes
getting stopped at the line · projected
LT#49 of 138ULM#103 of 138 - 3
Take shots
hitting chunk plays · projected
LT#80 of 138ULM#125 of 138
HowULMattacksLT
- 1
Take shots
hitting chunk plays · projected
ULM#8 of 138LT#115 of 138
The two teams
Louisiana Tech
Louisiana Tech is in year 5 under Sonny Cumbie, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 20th at stuffing runs at the line. The way in is 115th at keeping everything in front of them, and they are 106th at staying on schedule through the air.
On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+1.8%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −15.8% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
Louisiana Tech has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Defensegetting stopped at the line#20projected
- Defenserunning it#31projected
- Defensefirst and second down#31projected
Projected soft spots
- Defensehitting chunk plays#115projected
- Offensestaying on schedule through the air#106projected
UL Monroe
UL Monroe runs it: Bryant Vincent's offenses have been heavily run-leaning across 3 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 8th at hitting chunk plays. The way in is 128th at staying out of the backfield, and they are 125th at keeping a clean pocket.
On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+7.1%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −7.8% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
UL Monroe has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Offensehitting chunk plays#8projected
Projected soft spots
- Offensegetting stopped at the line#128projected
- Offensesacks and tackles for loss#125projected
- Defensehitting chunk plays#125projected
Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.
Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (ULM Elo 1079, LT Elo 1405 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects ULM +7.2 (32% to win), essentially in line with the market.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Where the game is won
2026 national rank · right is better
offensethe defense it faces
Moving the ball
LT79th134thULMULM132nd46thLTThrough the air
LT79th120thULMULM135th76thLTOn the ground
LT116th138thULMULM69th70thLTStaying on the field
LT73rd135thULMULM133rd63rdLTTaking care of it
LT74th76thULMULM21st9thLT
Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profilesLouisiana Tech leads 12–3 · Louisiana Tech has won 8 straight · 20% have been one-possession games
| LT | ULM | |
|---|---|---|
| -3.2 (#81) | CORE overall | -25.1 (#137) |
| -14 / -11 | offense / defense | -13 / +12 |
| 0.54 | points / drive | 1.50 |
| 2.47 | allowed / drive | 4.40 |
| 62% | three-and-outs | 36% |
| -5 | pass over expected | -12 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
FAQ
Who will win Louisiana Tech vs. UL Monroe?
Gridpex's model favors Louisiana Tech with a 68% win probability.
What's the predicted spread for Louisiana Tech vs. UL Monroe?
The model projects Louisiana Tech by 7.2.
What time is Louisiana Tech vs. UL Monroe and what channel is it on?
Time TBD, at Malone Stadium.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →