Iowa State vs. Iowa: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats
ISUTeam statsIOWA
- Q4 0:15IOWAC. Buhr 42 yd FG GOOD13–16
- Q4 6:22IOWAC. Buhr 32 yd FG GOOD13–13
- Q3 10:06ISUK. Konrardy 51 yd FG GOOD13–10
- Q2 0:28IOWAC. Buhr 45 yd FG GOOD10–10
- Q2 5:34IOWAH. Brown run for 1 yd, for a TD (C. Buhr KICK)10–7
- Q2 7:51ISUJ. Raynor pass to V. Benetti for 4 yds, for a TD (K. Konrardy KICK)10–0
- Q2 14:17ISUK. Konrardy 29 yd FG GOOD3–0
How the model called it
A year after Iowa State won 16-13 in Ames, the rematch turns on whether its offense can stay on schedule against a defense built to prevent exactly that.
Iowa State won this game 16-13 in Ames last September, so a two-touchdown number at Kinnick is not a verdict on which program is better. It is a verdict on one exchange: Iowa State's offense trying to stay on schedule against Iowa's defense, the most lopsided matchup on the field at 2.80 standard deviations. Iowa State's deep shots and Iowa's field position both run downstream of that single exchange, and so does the pace the game settles into.
- PassJaylen Raynor 10/19, 117 YDS, 1 TD
- RushAiden Flora 19 CAR, 89 YDS
- RecOmari Hayes 3 REC, 39 YDS
- PassHank Brown 21/30, 191 YDS
- RushKamari Moulton 15 CAR, 57 YDS
- RecTony Diaz 8 REC, 95 YDS
- Q4 4:17IOWA +26%
Shotgun #9 H.Brown pass complete short right to #28 K.Moulton caught at IOWA46, for 8 yards to the ISU47 (#7 S.Schlimgen)
- Q2 7:51ISU +22%
Shotgun #1 J.Raynor pass complete short left to #37 V.Benetti caught at IOWA04, for 4 yards to the IOWA00 TOUCHDOWN. The previous play is under automatic review - "Sho…
- Q2 5:34IOWA +21%
Shotgun #9 H.Brown rush left for 1 yard gain to the ISU00 TOUCHDOWN
- Q4 6:12ISU +21%
Shotgun #1 J.Raynor rush right for 2 yards loss to the ISU23 (#36 J.Montgomery)
- Q4 6:22IOWA +21%
#92 C.Buhr field goal attempt from 32 yards GOOD
- Q4 0:15IOWA +17%
#92 C.Buhr field goal attempt from 42 yards GOOD
FAQ
What was the final score of Iowa State vs. Iowa?
Iowa State 13, Iowa 16.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (IOWA) was correct.
| ISU | IOWA | |
|---|---|---|
| 255 | Total yards | 284 |
| 117 | Passing yards | 191 |
| 138 | Rushing yards | 93 |
| 9 | First downs | 13 |
| 4-13 | 3rd down | 5-15 |
| 0-0 | 4th down | 0-1 |
| 10/19 | Comp/Att | 21/30 |
| 6.2 | Yards per pass | 6.4 |
| 4.1 | Yards per rush | 3.2 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 6-45 | Penalties | 4-25 |
| 30:18 | Possession | 29:42 |
Costliest call
Q4 6:22 IOWA field goal on 4th & 1 at ISU 14. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.95 points.
- ISUEnd Of Quarter2 plays · 24 yds · from ISU 35 · Q4 0:15+2.2 EPA
- IOWAField Goal9 plays · 31 yds · from IOWA 45 · Q4 4:17+0.7 EPA+40% WP
- ISUPunt3 plays · 4 yds · from ISU 35 · Q4 6:22−0.3 EPA+2% WP
- IOWAField Goal11 plays · 43 yds · from IOWA 43 · Q4 12:26+1.4 EPA+11% WP
- ISUPunt3 plays · 4 yds · from ISU 9 · Q4 14:00−0.5 EPA+2% WP
- IOWAPunt3 plays · -5 yds · from ISU 45 · Q3 0:09−1.3 EPA−1% WP
- ISUPunt7 plays · 11 yds · from ISU 15 · Q3 3:38−1.1 EPA+4% WP
- IOWA—3 plays · 8 yds · from IOWA 32 · Q3−1.6 EPA−2% WP
- ISUPunt3 plays · 7 yds · from ISU 3 · Q3 7:57−0.1 EPA+2% WP
- IOWAPunt4 plays · 21 yds · from IOWA 35 · Q3 10:06−0.2 EPA−1% WP
- ISUField Goal8 plays · 41 yds · from ISU 35 · Q3 15:00+1.2 EPA+12% WP
- ISUEnd Of Half1 plays · 2 yds · from ISU 35 · Q2 0:28−0.5 EPA
- IOWAField Goal10 plays · 46 yds · from IOWA 27 · Q2 3:49+1.1 EPA+7% WP
- ISUPunt3 plays · 5 yds · from ISU 35 · Q2 5:34−1.0 EPA+1% WP
- Q4 0:15IOWAC. Buhr 42 yd FG GOOD13–16
- Q4 6:22IOWAC. Buhr 32 yd FG GOOD13–13
- Q3 10:06ISUK. Konrardy 51 yd FG GOOD13–10
- Q2 0:28IOWAC. Buhr 45 yd FG GOOD10–10
- Q2 5:34IOWAH. Brown run for 1 yd, for a TD (C. Buhr KICK)10–7
- Q2 7:51ISUJ. Raynor pass to V. Benetti for 4 yds, for a TD (K. Konrardy KICK)10–0
- Q2 14:17ISUK. Konrardy 29 yd FG GOOD3–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (IOWA Elo 1847, ISU Elo 1586 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects IOWA -14.8 (83% to win), essentially in line with the market.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profilesIowa leads 47–23 · Iowa State has won 2 straight · 41% have been one-possession games
| ISU | IOWA | |
|---|---|---|
| +1.4 (#66) | CORE overall | +20.7 (#10) |
| -2 / -3 | offense / defense | +6 / -14 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
Iowa State can't stay on schedule against Iowa
A year after Iowa State won 16-13 in Ames, the rematch turns on whether its offense can stay on schedule against a defense built to prevent exactly that.
Iowa State wins
The range of outcomes for this game. Each bar is how often the final margin lands in that range — the more it leans toward Iowa, the more likely Iowa wins.
Half of Iowa State's drives ended in three plays
Southeast Missouri State never threatened Iowa State, and Iowa State still went three-and-out on 50.0% of its 12 drives on the way to 38-10. It gained 27.8 yards per drive. Iowa gained 37.5 per drive against Northern Illinois and stalled on 30.8% of its 13. The 38 points flatter an offense that spent half the afternoon handing the ball back, and the drive chart points the same direction the season-long grades do.
Iowa did not allow a point in that game. A shutout of a MAC opponent settles nothing on its own, but it sits alongside a matchup that grades Iowa's defense 1.55 standard deviations clear of Iowa State's offense overall and 1.68 clear against the run. Iowa State's route to 24 points does not run through methodical possessions, because the grades and the drive chart agree those possessions end before third down becomes manageable.
The deep ball is Iowa State's only edge, and it's a real one
Two categories break Iowa State's way and they are really one category: big plays at 2.57 standard deviations, explosive passing at 1.81. Iowa State cannot grind, but it can win a possession in a single snap. That argues for fewer possessions, not more: every drive Iowa State wastes costs less in a short game, and every one it converts on one throw counts the same as a nine-play march.
Each unit matchup this season, sorted by how decisive it is — the top bar is what most tilts the game. Bars toward Iowa are battles it should win; toward Iowa State are ones Iowa State wins.
Dominic Overby projects for 14 to 24 receiving yards with a 36% chance of reaching the end zone against a pass defense ranked 21st of 185. Overby's 36% sits far above what 14 to 24 yards normally buys a receiver. He has not played this season, and his 4 games from a year ago are the whole file, but the role the projection gives him is narrow and valuable: not a chain-mover, a possession-ender.
Everywhere else the field tilts toward Iowa, with overall efficiency and the run game both falling to the home side by more than a standard and a half. That explosive passing edge is Iowa State's margin for error rather than a supplement to it. Edges built on explosives arrive in bunches or not at all, and the version of Saturday where they do not arrive looks nothing like Iowa State's 38 points last week.
Iowa State's defense is why 37 points is the optimistic read
Iowa State held Southeast Missouri State to 10 and arrives ranked 37th of 185 against the run and 31st of 185 against the pass. That is not a unit Iowa can lean on and wear out. Iowa is projected for 37, and reaching it plausibly requires short fields, stalled Iowa State possessions converted quickly, rather than sustained drives against a defense holding up in both phases.
Points allowed per drive across all FBS defenses (lower is better). Iowa State's defense is below average, better than only 20% of FBS defenses.
Kamari Moulton projects for 65 to 104 rushing yards with a 38% touchdown chance, which is a productive day rather than a controlling one against that front, and Xavier Williams adds 16 to 44 behind him. The run game is the trustworthy part of Iowa's offense, and even the trustworthy part projects as a grind: the yardage comes, the possessions take time, and Iowa State's defense stays in structure while it happens.
The passing projections are modest across the board, with DJ Vonnahme at 22 to 69 receiving yards and a 27% touchdown chance and Reece Vander Zee at 14 to 44, both working against a secondary ranked 31st of 185. Neither Vonnahme nor Vander Zee profiles as the player who cracks this open. Iowa's advantage is that it does not require one; it requires Iowa State to keep surrendering the ball on three plays.
The rivalry's habit and this projection disagree
Iowa and Iowa State have met 70 times since 1895, Iowa leads 47-23, and 41% of those meetings were decided by one possession; that is the series' actual history. This one is graded differently: a one-score finish gets about a 29% chance, and with the total at 41.2 the under is given roughly a one-in-five chance. That 41.2 sits well above what the 16-13 afternoon in Ames produced.
Each ingredient of our projection and the side it favors — bars toward Iowa are why it's the pick (home field is counted separately).
Last September in Ames is the most recent direct evidence about these two programs, and it was a field-goal rock fight that went Iowa State's way. The forecast concedes the rivalry's habit and still lands on 37-24, because the low-scoring version of this game requires Iowa State to move it on early downs, which is precisely the thing the matchup grades say it cannot do for four quarters against this Iowa front.
The upset needs a Short, quiet game
Iowa State's path is not exotic. The projection puts this game into an even-turnover, low-event script in 78% of its runs, and gives Iowa a two-or-more turnover edge in none of them. With giveaways off the table, Iowa State's 2.57 standard deviation edge in big plays is the only lever left. Two connected shots downfield, plus a defense that has already held an opponent to 10, puts Iowa State inside a touchdown late.
The number is priced tight against that: Iowa covers 14 in 48% of projected outcomes. An 81% win probability paired with a near-even cover rate is one coherent statement rather than two contradictory ones, Iowa is very likely to win and not especially likely to win by more than two scores. That is what a heavy home favorite looks like when its advantage is defensive rather than explosive: the wins accumulate, the margins do not.
What has to happen
Iowa needs early-down stops that turn last week's 50.0% three-and-out rate into field position, then Moulton's 65 to 104 yards on the ground to convert those short fields into touchdowns instead of field goals. Iowa State needs the game short, the turnover column flat, and Overby's 36% touchdown chance to land, because one explosive score is worth more to this offense than any drive it is realistically going to sustain against Iowa.
Our coverage of this game
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →