Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: George Washington change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Tulsa a 3.7-point favourite at about 72 possessions; at George Washington it is -0.3, at Tulsa -7.2 (from George Washington's side).

Neutral
-3.7
71.8 poss.
At George Washington
-0.3
71.8 poss.
At Tulsa
-7.2
71.8 poss.

Margins are from George Washington's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricGeorge WashingtonTulsa
Adjusted efficiency margin+8.380+13.543
Adjusted offence114.655117.625
Adjusted defence106.3158104.1110
Adjusted tempo72.74471.0121
Raw offence114.053117.619
Raw defence107.1182104.098
Effective FG%54.5%5255.5%30
Turnover rate16.7%26614.6%110
Offensive rebound rate80.2%240116.1%101
Free-throw rate34.1%20340.9%50
Opponent eFG%52.1%22449.5%81
Opponent turnover rate16.3%12714.4%249
Defensive rebound rate26.0%833.4%204
Opponent free-throw rate34.6%17232.1%110
Three-point attempt rate47.0%3246.6%37
Raw tempo71.111471.694

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.