Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: UNC Wilmington change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make UNC Wilmington a 0.7-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at UNC Wilmington it is +4.0, at Utah Valley -2.6 (from UNC Wilmington's side).
- Neutral
- +0.7
- 68.8 poss.
- At UNC Wilmington
- +4.0
- 68.8 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- -2.6
- 68.8 poss.
Margins are from UNC Wilmington's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  UNC Wilmington |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +8.876 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 111.581 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.775 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 66.7331 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 113.363 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 100.339 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 50.8%201 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 13.3%31 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 143.1%53 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 40.7%54 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 47.3%27 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 13.9%299 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -222.1%352 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 31.0%83 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 39.3%186 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 66.9315 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.