Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Seton Hall change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Seton Hall a 2.2-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at Utah Valley it is +1.1, at Seton Hall -5.5 (from Utah Valley's side).
- Neutral
- -2.2
- 69.1 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- +1.1
- 69.1 poss.
- At Seton Hall
- -5.5
- 69.1 poss.
Margins are from Utah Valley's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Utah Valley |  Seton Hall |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +7.981 | +11.157 |
| Adjusted offence | 109.8108 | 107.1164 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.059 | 96.015 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.8138 | 67.3314 |
| Raw offence | 109.2127 | 104.1237 |
| Raw defence | 99.029 | 97.519 |
| Effective FG% | 54.9%40 | 47.6%320 |
| Turnover rate | 18.9%350 | 15.1%146 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 160.1%42 | 127.6%74 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.3%95 | 35.3%171 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.4%77 | 47.3%25 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 19.8%6 | 19.6%8 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -78.1%333 | -58.2%316 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.2%287 | 42.1%325 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 32.9%317 | 26.8%361 |
| Raw tempo | 71.3106 | 67.3298 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.