Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Akron change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Akron a 2.0-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Utah Valley it is +1.5, at Akron -5.4 (from Utah Valley's side).
- Neutral
- -2.0
- 71.5 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- +1.5
- 71.5 poss.
- At Akron
- -5.4
- 71.5 poss.
Margins are from Utah Valley's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Utah Valley |  Akron |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +7.981 | +10.661 |
| Adjusted offence | 109.8108 | 115.051 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.059 | 104.4114 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.8138 | 72.166 |
| Raw offence | 109.2127 | 118.215 |
| Raw defence | 99.029 | 103.896 |
| Effective FG% | 54.9%40 | 57.4%11 |
| Turnover rate | 18.9%350 | 14.6%114 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 160.1%42 | 135.4%65 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.3%95 | 30.1%308 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.4%77 | 50.9%146 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 19.8%6 | 17.1%83 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -78.1%333 | -57.7%315 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.2%287 | 30.7%79 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 32.9%317 | 45.1%65 |
| Raw tempo | 71.3106 | 72.278 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.