Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Stephen F. Austin change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: St. John's change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make St. John's a 9.4-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Stephen F. Austin it is -6.0, at St. John's -12.8 (from Stephen F. Austin's side).

Neutral
-9.4
70.7 poss.
At Stephen F. Austin
-6.0
70.7 poss.
At St. John's
-12.8
70.7 poss.

Margins are from Stephen F. Austin's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricStephen F. AustinSt. John's
Adjusted efficiency margin+7.483+20.717
Adjusted offence109.5115115.346
Adjusted defence102.16594.710
Adjusted tempo69.222872.359
Raw offence110.4101111.681
Raw defence98.82897.216
Effective FG%51.7%16051.2%188
Turnover rate13.1%2413.6%45
Offensive rebound rate123.9%8194.3%179
Free-throw rate30.1%30640.8%53
Opponent eFG%47.8%3447.5%31
Opponent turnover rate16.3%12617.6%53
Defensive rebound rate-55.0%311-5.0%230
Opponent free-throw rate31.1%8831.4%95
Three-point attempt rate39.8%17635.2%267
Raw tempo67.728672.275

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.