Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Stephen F. Austin change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Minnesota change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Stephen F. Austin a 0.3-point favourite at about 67 possessions; at Stephen F. Austin it is +3.6, at Minnesota -2.9 (from Stephen F. Austin's side).

Neutral
+0.3
67.2 poss.
At Stephen F. Austin
+3.6
67.2 poss.
At Minnesota
-2.9
67.2 poss.

Margins are from Stephen F. Austin's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricStephen F. AustinMinnesota
Adjusted efficiency margin+7.483+6.988
Adjusted offence109.5115109.2124
Adjusted defence102.165102.366
Adjusted tempo69.222865.2356
Raw offence110.4101108.2146
Raw defence98.828105.6136
Effective FG%51.7%16053.9%70
Turnover rate13.1%2415.3%166
Offensive rebound rate123.9%8183.8%224
Free-throw rate30.1%30635.8%159
Opponent eFG%47.8%3451.9%203
Opponent turnover rate16.3%12615.3%194
Defensive rebound rate-55.0%31134.5%40
Opponent free-throw rate31.1%8826.9%23
Three-point attempt rate39.8%17647.2%31
Raw tempo67.728664.7361

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.