Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: St. John's change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

Akron Alabama Arizona Arizona State Arkansas Auburn Baylor Belmont Boise State Butler BYU California Cincinnati Clemson Colorado Colorado State Creighton Dayton Duke East Tennessee State Florida Florida State George Mason George Washington Georgetown Georgia Gonzaga Grand Canyon High Point Hofstra Houston Illinois Illinois State Indiana Iowa Iowa State Kansas Kentucky Liberty Louisville LSU McNeese Miami Miami (OH)Michigan Michigan State Minnesota Missouri Murray State NC State Nebraska Nevada New Mexico North Carolina Northern Iowa Northwestern Ohio State Oklahoma Oklahoma State Ole Miss Providence Purdue Saint Louis Saint Mary's San Diego State Santa Clara Seton Hall SMU South Florida St. John's St. Thomas-Minnesota Stanford Stephen F. Austin Syracuse TCU Tennessee Texas Texas A&M Texas Tech Tulsa UCF UCLA UConn UNC Wilmington USC UT Rio Grande Valley Utah State Utah Valley Vanderbilt VCU Villanova Virginia Virginia Tech Wake Forest Washington West Virginia Wichita State Wisconsin Wyoming Yale

Team 2: TCU change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make St. John's a 6.0-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at St. John's it is +9.4, at TCU +2.5 (from St. John's's side).

Neutral: +6.0; 71.3 poss.
At St. John's: +9.4; 71.3 poss.
At TCU: +2.5; 71.3 poss.

Margins are from St. John's's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

Metric	St. John's	TCU
Adjusted efficiency margin	+20.717	+12.348
Adjusted offence	115.346	111.582
Adjusted defence	94.710	99.230
Adjusted tempo	72.359	70.4162
Raw offence	111.681	108.8132
Raw defence	97.216	101.861
Effective FG%	51.2%188	50.8%200
Turnover rate	13.6%45	14.3%89
Offensive rebound rate	94.3%179	88.6%203
Free-throw rate	40.8%53	38.3%97
Opponent eFG%	47.5%31	51.1%160
Opponent turnover rate	17.6%53	18.2%35
Defensive rebound rate	-5.0%230	7.6%177
Opponent free-throw rate	31.4%95	30.6%75
Three-point attempt rate	35.2%267	36.9%229
Raw tempo	72.275	71.4102

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.