Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Texas A&M change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Texas A&M a 3.0-point favourite at about 72 possessions; at Texas A&M it is +6.5, at Utah Valley -0.5 (from Texas A&M's side).
- Neutral
- +3.0
- 72.4 poss.
- At Texas A&M
- +6.5
- 72.4 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- -0.5
- 72.4 poss.
Margins are from Texas A&M's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Texas A&M |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +12.050 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 114.854 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.880 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 74.022 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 114.152 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 108.0209 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 53.8%73 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 13.9%59 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 109.2%127 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.1%128 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 51.0%153 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.9%87 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 4.9%195 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 35.0%181 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 46.2%41 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 74.615 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.