Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Stanford change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Stanford a 1.0-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Stanford it is +4.4, at Utah Valley -2.3 (from Stanford's side).
- Neutral
- +1.0
- 69.9 poss.
- At Stanford
- +4.4
- 69.9 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- -2.3
- 69.9 poss.
Margins are from Stanford's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Stanford |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +9.369 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 112.671 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 103.288 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 69.0236 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 110.0105 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 105.5133 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 51.4%173 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 13.9%58 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 133.3%68 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 36.1%146 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 50.9%150 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 17.3%71 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -70.4%327 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.9%300 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%85 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 69.2226 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.