Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Vanderbilt change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Clemson change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Vanderbilt a 5.3-point favourite at about 68 possessions; at Vanderbilt it is +8.6, at Clemson +2.0 (from Vanderbilt's side).
- Neutral
- +5.3
- 68.2 poss.
- At Vanderbilt
- +8.6
- 68.2 poss.
- At Clemson
- +2.0
- 68.2 poss.
Margins are from Vanderbilt's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Vanderbilt |  Clemson |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +22.411 | +14.637 |
| Adjusted offence | 121.37 | 113.166 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.027 | 98.525 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.4161 | 66.0345 |
| Raw offence | 119.56 | 111.092 |
| Raw defence | 104.099 | 101.253 |
| Effective FG% | 55.3%34 | 52.3%131 |
| Turnover rate | 12.4%11 | 12.7%16 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 73.1%282 | 68.3%305 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.1%101 | 37.2%125 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%65 | 49.0%66 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.5%116 | 15.9%154 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 34.1%41 | 33.8%42 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.5%292 | 34.2%155 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%86 | 43.3%105 |
| Raw tempo | 72.181 | 66.2337 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.