Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Vanderbilt change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Saint Louis change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Vanderbilt a 2.9-point favourite at about 72 possessions; at Vanderbilt it is +6.4, at Saint Louis -0.6 (from Vanderbilt's side).
- Neutral
- +2.9
- 72.0 poss.
- At Vanderbilt
- +6.4
- 72.0 poss.
- At Saint Louis
- -0.6
- 72.0 poss.
Margins are from Vanderbilt's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Vanderbilt |  Saint Louis |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +22.411 | +18.324 |
| Adjusted offence | 121.37 | 117.528 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.027 | 99.229 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.4161 | 73.624 |
| Raw offence | 119.56 | 118.613 |
| Raw defence | 104.099 | 97.520 |
| Effective FG% | 55.3%34 | 59.9%2 |
| Turnover rate | 12.4%11 | 16.9%277 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 73.1%282 | 133.6%67 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.1%101 | 34.0%211 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%65 | 44.6%2 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.5%116 | 14.7%230 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 34.1%41 | 4.3%199 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.5%292 | 37.1%237 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%86 | 44.9%71 |
| Raw tempo | 72.181 | 73.239 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.