Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Iowa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Iowa a 3.8-point favourite at about 68 possessions; at Iowa it is +7.1, at Tulsa +0.6 (from Iowa's side).
- Neutral
- +3.8
- 67.8 poss.
- At Iowa
- +7.1
- 67.8 poss.
- At Tulsa
- +0.6
- 67.8 poss.
Margins are from Iowa's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Iowa |  Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +19.222 | +13.543 |
| Adjusted offence | 119.512 | 117.625 |
| Adjusted defence | 100.342 | 104.1110 |
| Adjusted tempo | 64.6362 | 71.0121 |
| Raw offence | 117.521 | 117.619 |
| Raw defence | 104.2105 | 104.098 |
| Effective FG% | 56.4%19 | 55.5%30 |
| Turnover rate | 13.9%62 | 14.6%110 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 92.7%184 | 116.1%101 |
| Free-throw rate | 35.1%179 | 40.9%50 |
| Opponent eFG% | 52.6%247 | 49.5%81 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 19.1%17 | 14.4%249 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 5.8%189 | 3.4%204 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 38.5%272 | 32.1%110 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 43.2%110 | 46.6%37 |
| Raw tempo | 63.6364 | 71.694 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.