Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Belmont change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Hofstra change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Belmont a 1.2-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at Belmont it is +4.6, at Hofstra -2.1 (from Belmont's side).
- Neutral
- +1.2
- 69.2 poss.
- At Belmont
- +4.6
- 69.2 poss.
- At Hofstra
- -2.1
- 69.2 poss.
Margins are from Belmont's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Belmont |  Hofstra |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +11.355 | +9.666 |
| Adjusted offence | 116.737 | 111.979 |
| Adjusted defence | 105.4135 | 102.367 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.1116 | 67.3313 |
| Raw offence | 117.620 | 111.977 |
| Raw defence | 104.0100 | 101.254 |
| Effective FG% | 61.4%1 | 51.4%176 |
| Turnover rate | 17.4%303 | 14.5%99 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 116.3%99 | 74.3%270 |
| Free-throw rate | 32.4%250 | 31.6%262 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.9%97 | 46.3%13 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.1%139 | 13.7%310 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 4.7%197 | 30.5%60 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 30.7%77 | 35.1%184 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 45.7%56 | 42.8%119 |
| Raw tempo | 71.3108 | 67.1306 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.