Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Wyoming change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Tulsa a 5.1-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Tulsa it is +8.5, at Wyoming +1.8 (from Tulsa's side).
- Neutral
- +5.1
- 69.8 poss.
- At Tulsa
- +8.5
- 69.8 poss.
- At Wyoming
- +1.8
- 69.8 poss.
Margins are from Tulsa's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Tulsa |  Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +13.543 | +6.292 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.625 | 111.484 |
| Adjusted defence | 104.1110 | 105.2132 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.0121 | 68.5263 |
| Raw offence | 117.619 | 111.682 |
| Raw defence | 104.098 | 106.9176 |
| Effective FG% | 55.5%30 | 52.0%142 |
| Turnover rate | 14.6%110 | 15.1%149 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 116.1%101 | 114.4%107 |
| Free-throw rate | 40.9%50 | 35.6%162 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.5%81 | 52.2%227 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.4%249 | 15.7%167 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 3.4%204 | -43.9%297 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.1%110 | 48.4%360 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 46.6%37 | 43.0%116 |
| Raw tempo | 71.694 | 68.3262 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.