Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Akron change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Tulsa a 2.1-point favourite at about 72 possessions; at Tulsa it is +5.5, at Akron -1.4 (from Tulsa's side).
- Neutral
- +2.1
- 71.5 poss.
- At Tulsa
- +5.5
- 71.5 poss.
- At Akron
- -1.4
- 71.5 poss.
Margins are from Tulsa's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Tulsa |  Akron |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +13.543 | +10.661 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.625 | 115.051 |
| Adjusted defence | 104.1110 | 104.4114 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.0121 | 72.166 |
| Raw offence | 117.619 | 118.215 |
| Raw defence | 104.098 | 103.896 |
| Effective FG% | 55.5%30 | 57.4%11 |
| Turnover rate | 14.6%110 | 14.6%114 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 116.1%101 | 135.4%65 |
| Free-throw rate | 40.9%50 | 30.1%308 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.5%81 | 50.9%146 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.4%249 | 17.1%83 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 3.4%204 | -57.7%315 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.1%110 | 30.7%79 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 46.6%37 | 45.1%65 |
| Raw tempo | 71.694 | 72.278 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.