Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Oklahoma State change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Utah Valley a 1.4-point favourite at about 73 possessions; at Oklahoma State it is +2.1, at Utah Valley -4.9 (from Oklahoma State's side).
- Neutral
- -1.4
- 73.2 poss.
- At Oklahoma State
- +2.1
- 73.2 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- -4.9
- 73.2 poss.
Margins are from Oklahoma State's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Oklahoma State |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +6.095 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 112.077 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 106.1150 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 75.65 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 109.0129 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 109.3245 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 51.9%150 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 15.0%136 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 104.9%142 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 39.0%81 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 53.0%267 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.2%202 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 12.0%162 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.1%108 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 35.7%255 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 76.47 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.