Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Duke change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Duke a 16.3-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at Duke it is +19.6, at Utah Valley +12.9 (from Duke's side).
- Neutral
- +16.3
- 69.2 poss.
- At Duke
- +19.6
- 69.2 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- +12.9
- 69.2 poss.
Margins are from Duke's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Duke |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +31.41 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 122.63 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 91.23 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 67.6305 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 120.34 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 94.03 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 56.5%15 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 15.0%131 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 104.1%143 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.0%102 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 46.5%15 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.1%134 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -13.7%249 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 23.1%2 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 43.6%97 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 67.9279 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.