Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Minnesota change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: George Washington change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make George Washington a 1.0-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at Minnesota it is +2.3, at George Washington -4.3 (from Minnesota's side).

Neutral
-1.0
69.0 poss.
At Minnesota
+2.3
69.0 poss.
At George Washington
-4.3
69.0 poss.

Margins are from Minnesota's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricMinnesotaGeorge Washington
Adjusted efficiency margin+6.988+8.380
Adjusted offence109.2124114.655
Adjusted defence102.366106.3158
Adjusted tempo65.235672.744
Raw offence108.2146114.053
Raw defence105.6136107.1182
Effective FG%53.9%7054.5%52
Turnover rate15.3%16616.7%266
Offensive rebound rate83.8%22480.2%240
Free-throw rate35.8%15934.1%203
Opponent eFG%51.9%20352.1%224
Opponent turnover rate15.3%19416.3%127
Defensive rebound rate34.5%4026.0%83
Opponent free-throw rate26.9%2334.6%172
Three-point attempt rate47.2%3147.0%32
Raw tempo64.736171.1114

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.